Hygrothermal Durability and Damage Evolution of Bio-Epoxy-Based Composites Reinforced with Different Fibre Types
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study investigates hygrothermal durability of bio-epoxy composites reinforced with carbon, E-glass, basalt, and flax fibres. Fibre yarns and bio-composites were exposed for 3000 h at 60 °C and 98% relative humidity. The tensile strength reduction in the fibres and the interfacial shear strength (IFSS) reduction in the composites were assessed after ageing. Chemical deterioration was evaluated using energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS); morphological changes in fibres and composites fracture surfaces were examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results indicated that the durability was significantly influenced by fibre types. Tensile strength reduction was higher in carbon, glass and basalt compared to flax yarns because of chemical degradation of the sizing layer in synthetic fibres, while only physical damage was observed in flax. The IFSS reduction was highest in flax composites (10%), and lowest in carbon (4%). EDS indicated the hydrolysis and erosion of fibre sizing, with reduced silica content in glass and basalt fibres. SEM revealed matrix-dominated failure in carbon/bio-epoxy, interfacial debonding in glass and basalt composites, fibre slip and pull-out in flax/bio-epoxy. Overall, the results highlighted damage propagation pathways and demonstrated that bio-epoxy composites exhibited reasonable performance under hygrothermal ageing, supporting their potential as a sustainable alternative in durability-critical applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".