Subjective and Functional Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is a common postoperative complaint following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), with incidence rates ranging from 1.7% to 71%. The variability in incidence rates raises the question of whether dysphagia warrants clinical concern or represents a transient, expected symptom. The aim of this study was to characterize the time course and impact of dysphagia following anterior cervical surgery for degenerative pathology with use of both subjective and objective measures. METHODS: Patients undergoing either lumbar or cervical spine surgery from 2023 to 2024 were prospectively enrolled. Lumbar cases were limited to 1 to 2-level, decompression-only procedures, whereas cervical cases included up to 3-level ACDF and/or cervical disc replacement (CDR). Dysphagia was assessed using the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) and the Yale Swallow Protocol at 5 time points: preoperatively and on postoperative days (PODs) 0, 3, 7, and 30. Postoperative responses were collected electronically. Retropharyngeal radiographic measurements at C3-C7 were obtained preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at the first follow-up. Measurements were taken from the vertebral midbody to the posterior airway space. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients (67 in the cervical group and 67 in the lumbar group) were included. The groups were demographically similar, although the cervical group had a longer mean operative time (86.7 versus 62.2 minutes; p < 0.001). Dysphagia was more prevalent in the cervical group across all postoperative time points: POD0 (70.1% versus 13.4%), POD3 (64.2% versus 10.4%), POD7 (40.3% versus 6.0%), and POD30 (35.8% versus 4.5%) (all p ≤ 0.001). EAT-10 scores correlated strongly across postoperative time points and modestly with procedure duration. Male sex was associated with lower EAT-10 scores through POD7 (p < 0.001). Intraoperative steroid use trended toward reduced EAT-10 scores but was not significant after correction. Retropharyngeal measurements increased immediately postoperatively (notably at C3, C4, C5, and C7), but swelling resolved by the time of follow-up, except at C3 and C4. CONCLUSIONS: Dysphagia was frequent after anterior cervical surgery, peaking early and partially resolving by 1 month. These findings support its characterization as a common, self-limited postoperative symptom rather than a true complication in most cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".