MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117322619 · doi:10.1002/alz70856_103744

Evaluation of Plasma Phosphorylated Tau217 for Differentiating Alzheimer's Disease

2025· article· en· W7117322619 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Mammel, Ging‐Yuek Robin Hsiung, Ali Mousavi, Pankaj Kumar, Kelsey Hallett, Ian R. Mackenzie, Veronica Hirsch‐Reinshagen, Donald Biehl, Pradip Gil, Mary Joy Encarnacion, Hans Frykman

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiseasePhosphorylationHuman plasma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Blood-based biomarkers provide an accessible and cost-effective tool for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD). Among these biomarkers, phosphorylated tau 217 (p-tau217) shows promise for AD diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and facilitating access to emerging disease-modifying therapies. This study evaluates the ALZpath plasma p-tau217 assay as a Laboratory Developed Test for distinguishing AD pathology from other concurrent pathologies associated with AD. METHOD: We examined EDTA plasma samples of autopsy confirmed (n = 110) of patients assessed at the UBC Hospital Clinic for Alzheimer's disease. The cohort was characterized as AD only (n = 30), AD with CAA (n = 7), AD with DLB (n = 13), AD with Vascular (n = 7), AD with mix pathologies (n = 13), TDP-43 only (n = 18), Synuclein only(n = 4), Tau only (n = 18). The samples were analyzed by the ALZpath p-tau217 v2 assay on a single Quanterix HD-X SIMOA Analyzer platform. RESULTS: While the plasma p-tau217 concentrations in cases with AD (1.6 ± 0.8 ng/L) were higher than those in AD with DLB cases (1.1 ± 0.7 ng/L) and cases with AD plus vascular pathology (1.0 ± 0.6 ng/L), and lower than in cases with AD plus CAA (1.7 ± 0.6 ng/L), these differences were not statistically significant. However, the concentrations were significantly higher than those in cases with AD with mixed pathologies (0.7 ± 0.4 ng/L), TDP-43 only (0.3 ± 0.2 ng/L), synuclein only (0.4 ± 0.1 ng/L), and tau only (0.3 ± 0.2 ng/L) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In our current study, plasma p-tau217 levels did not differentiate AD with DLB, AD with vascular pathology, or AD with CAA cases from the AD group, though they could differentiate AD from cases with mixed pathologies, TDP-43 only, synuclein only, and tau-only pathology. This suggests co-existing AD pathology, making their p-tau measurements similar to the AD group. Further studies with autopsy-defined samples will be needed to clarify the role of plasma p-tau217 in these groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicAlzheimer's disease research and treatments→French-language works237,207→