MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117323654 · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2025.3648360

Data Driven Deep Neural Network Based Task Offloading on Edge Cloud Continuum

2025· article· W7117323654 on OpenAlexaff
Mansi Sahi, Nitin Auluck, Akramul Azim, Pooja Bhardwaj, M. A. Maruf

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingComputation offloadingArtificial neural networkEdge computingEdge deviceEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionTask (project management)ComputationData-driven

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Edge computing reduces bandwidth bottlenecks and latency by performing computations close to end-users, making it a viable option for application task offloading. Owing to its limited computational capacity, the cloud may need to be considered with the edge for offloading. Task offloading is challenging, because of the availability of limited resources, dynamically changing network conditions, and concurrent user access. Mathematical task offloading approaches may be incapable of capturing dynamic network situations in large end-to-end network models. We propose D2-TONE (Data-driven Deep Neural Network Task Offloading on the Network Edge), an approach that employs Machine Learning (ML) algorithms to accurately estimate offloading costs, such as computation and transmission costs. D2-TONE adapts holistically to dynamic network situations, and provides optimal/near-optimal offloading solutions in real-time. In addition, D2-TONE employs the distributed execution of Deep Neural Network (DNN) training tasks on the edge-cloud continuum. Experiments revealed that D2-TONE reduces the training time by 1.55 to 2.77 times, compared to baseline approaches. In addition, the edge based D2-TONE offers an improvement of 55-76% in the data processing ratio, compared to other offloading approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service ManagementSame topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207