MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117337546 · doi:10.1002/alz70856_103914

Genetic architecture of Parkinson's disease: investigating the relationships between pathway‐specific polygenic risk scores and neuroanatomical features

2025· article· en· W7117337546 on OpenAlexaff
Houman Azizi, Alexandre Pastor‐Bernier, Christina Tremblay, Nooshin Abbasi, L Liu, Konstantin Senkevich, Moohebat Pourmajidian, Filip Morys, Peter Savadjiev, Eric Yu, Jean‐Baptiste Poline, Ziv Gan‐Or, Yashar Zeighami, Alain Dagher

Bibliographic record

VenueAlzheimer s & Dementia · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalMcGill UniversityDouglas Mental Health University InstituteMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenetic architecturePolygenic risk scoreGrey matterDiseaseWhite matterMultifactorial InheritancePhenotypeGeneGenetic variants

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) is associated with various genetic risk factors and brain structural alterations. However, how these genetic factors influence brain anatomy and potentially contribute to disease risk remains unclear. Here, we aimed to characterize neuroanatomical correlates of PD genetic risk and differentiate between potential genetic factors that affect neurodevelopmental processes and those that contribute to later-life vulnerability toward PD METHOD: Associations between polygenic risk scores of PD (PD-PRS) and structural and microstructural brain measures were examined using linear regression, and potentially causal relationships between brain structure and PD diagnosis were investigated through Mendelian randomization. Next, PD risk genes were stratified based on their functions into three distinct components of lysosomal, autophagy, and mitochondrial genes, and their pathway-specific neuroanatomical associations were assessed using linear regression. Finally, we investigated the developmental gene expression trajectories of each pathway using RNA-sequencing data spanning fetal stages through adulthood and compared them to the expression patterns of other PD risk genes. RESULT: PD-PRS showed widespread positive associations with cortical SA, subcortical volumes, and white matter FA [Figure 1]. Mendelian randomization revealed increased cortical SA and larger subcortical volumes to have a potentially causal effect on PD development [Figure 2]. No significant associations were observed between lysosomal, autophagy, or mitochondrial pathway-specific PD-PRSs and brain structural measures. Developmental gene expression trajectory analyses revealed distinct patterns of expression for mitochondrial and autophagy pathway genes, showing significantly lower expression during fetal stages compared to other PD risk genes [Figure 3]. CONCLUSION: Our findings reveal a link between PD genetic risk and brain structure, indicative of greater size of grey matter and higher white matter integrity, potentially leading to increased risk of PD development. Additionally, the lower expression of mitochondrial and autophagy pathway genes during fetal stages as well as the non-significant associations between pathway-specific polygenic risk scores and neuroanatomical features suggest that these pathways may contribute to disease risk through mechanisms independent of early neurodevelopmental processes. These results provide new insights into how genetic risk factors might shape brain structure and contribute to PD susceptibility, highlighting the complex interplay between developmental and pathway-specific mechanisms in PD pathogenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAlzheimer s & Dementia→Same topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→