MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117365469 · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5c05034

Anion Exchange and Nebulizer-Enhanced Online UV-Chemiluminescence Analyzer Coupled with LC-MS for Total and Novel N-Nitrosamines in Cigarettes and e-Juices

2025· article· en· W7117365469 on OpenAlexafffund
X. Andrew Guo, Bryce N. Thomas, K. N. Minh Chau, Di Zhang, Qiming Shen, Shakiba Talebian, Anastasiia Kim, Ran Zhao, Xing-Fang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Treatment and Disinfection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersAlberta InnovatesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsSpectrum analyzerCalibrationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Mass spectrometryIon chromatographyInterference (communication)Ion-mobility spectrometryMatrix (chemical analysis)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantification of total N-nitrosamines (TONO) is critical for assessing environmental carcinogens. UV-chemiluminescence (UV-CL) shows promise for TONO analysis; however, the data accuracy is limited by matrix interference and the analyte-specific method sensitivity. To overcome these challenges, we designed a new online UV-CL analyzer integrating anion exchange cartridges (AEC) and a homemade nebulizer. The AEC eliminates interference from a wide concentration range of NO 2 – . The nebulizer effectively introduces both volatile and less-volatile nitrosamines, achieving 98.4% photolysis while requiring only 14–53% of the UV dosage used in previous studies. Our analyzer achieved a universal calibration across structurally diverse N-nitrosamines, simplifying quantitative N-nitrosamine measurements. We further demonstrated its application by measuring TONO in authentic tobacco products. Compared to liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS), the analyzer obtained consistent kinetic results when monitoring the reaction between NO 2 – and nornicotine, supporting its application in kinetic studies. Moreover, our preliminary analysis of flavored e-juices shows that they could contain up to 0.24 μmol/g of TONO, which could increase further when an environmental level of NO 2 – (6.7 mg/L) is present. Comparing results obtained using the analyzer and LC-MS, known tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs) account for less than 5.5% of TONO, indicating that most N-nitrosamines in tobacco are unknown. This led to the tentative identification of two new N-nitrosamines: pyridine-methylated N-nitrosoanatabine and pyridine-methylated N-nitrosoanabasine using high-resolution HPLC-MS/MS. Our results supported the feasibility of using the UV-CL analyzer for rapid TONO measurements and highlighted the need to monitor N-nitrosamine contamination in e-juice and tobacco products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicWater Treatment and DisinfectionFrench-language works237,207