MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117368553 · doi:10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf783

Prediction of inclisiran efficacy in patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: the SIRIUS <i>in-silico</i> modelling of cardiovascular outcomes

2025· article· en· W7117368553 on OpenAlexaff
Denis Angoulvant, Emmanuel Peyronnet, Bertrand CARIOU, Pierre Amarenco, Franck Boccara, Jean‐Pierre Boissel, Alexandre Bastien, Eulalie Courcelles, Alizée Diatchenko, Anne Filipovics, Solène Granjeon-Noriot, Riad Kahoul, Guillaume Mahé, L. Fernández Portal, Solène Porte, Yishu Wang, Emmanuelle Bechet, P S Steg

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Preventive Cardiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Canadian institutionsPopulation Health Research Institute
FundersNovartis Pharma
KeywordsSiriusOutcome (game theory)MEDLINECardiovascular healthAtherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseClinical trial

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aims Inclisiran, an siRNA-targeting hepatic PCSK9 mRNA, reduces low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), but its effect on major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) remains unconfirmed. The SIRIUS in-silico modelling programme aimed to predict the efficacy of inclisiran on MACE in virtual patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Methods and results The SIRIUS simulation (NCT05974345) used a validated mechanistic model of ASCVD and lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) effects in a virtual population with established ASCVD and LDL-C ≥ 70 mg/dL. Each virtual patient served as their own control to compare inclisiran vs. placebo as an adjunct to high-intensity statin therapy, alone or with ezetimibe over 5 years. The model did not account for non-adherence, recurrent events, or adverse effects. Among 204 691 virtual patients, inclisiran was predicted to reduce LDL-C by 49.7% vs. placebo (from 91.1 to 48.3 mg/dL). Relative to placebo, inclisiran was predicted to lower 5 years risk of 3-point MACE by 25.2% (11.3% vs. 14.9%), myocardial infarction by 34.8% [5.7% vs. 8.6%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.65], ischaemic stroke by 26% (2.6% vs. 3.4%; HR 0.74), and major adverse limb event by 34.1% (0.5% vs. 0.8%; HR 0.66). A 7.1% relative reduction of cardiovascular death was predicted (4.2% vs. 4.5%; HR 0.93). Conclusion SIRIUS is the first in-silico simulation using a knowledge-based mechanistic model to predict the efficacy of LLT on cardiovascular outcomes in ASCVD. These findings offer an early model-based prediction of inclisiran’s potential cardiovascular benefit ahead of Phase 3 outcome trials. Lay summary The SIRIUS in-silico simulation used a validated knowledge-based mechanistic computational model to computationally simulate inclisiran efficacy on 5-year MACE in 204 691 virtual patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).Mean predicted percentage reduction in LDL-C with inclisiran vs. placebo was 49.7% at 5 years, with a 25.2% reduction in 3-point MACE.This simulation provides early insights into the potential effect of inclisiran on cardiovascular event reduction in advance of results from ongoing Phase 3 trial.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.453
Threshold uncertainty score0.693

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Preventive CardiologySame topicLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthFrench-language works237,207