Chaos-based Pseudo Random Number Generators via quasi-synchronized Chua’s circuits: a symmetric encryption perspective
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Research efforts have extensively shown the significant roles of unpredictable phenomena originated in nature, such as chaos, as an inspiring discipline to generate random numbers. In the current study, focusing on encryption purposes, the main strategy is to provide a keystream using Pseudo Random Number Generators (PRNGs) derived from synchronized chaotic systems. Numerous Investigations performed on the synchronized configuration of Chua’s circuit have proven the advantage of its application as a prominent chaotic system. However, the less than ideal alignment between the core objective of the research, that is offering a secure communication optionally necessitating an arbitrary distance of the correspondents, and the standard version of synchronized Chua’s circuits not fulfilling this condition pragmatically, made the authors tackle the problem analytically by using the governing equations of the circuits and creating the so-called quasi-synchronized condition between the receiving and the transmitting sides. At last, eight different mathematical schemes are designed to manipulate the numerical data provided by the Chua’s equations to generate binary sequences for encryption purposes and then the main attempt has been dedicated to the evaluation of the results and finding the optimal PRNGs by conventional standards in cryptography provided by National Institute of Standards and Technology. Finally, three of the designed schemes are chosen as the successful methods, passing randomness criteria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it