MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117410197 · doi:10.2147/clep.s546090

Validity of the Leading Causes of Death Classification for Premature Mortality in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Population-Based Comparison with ICD-10 Coding in Ontario, Canada

2025· article· en· W7117410197 on OpenAlex
Gemma Postill, M Ellen Kuenzig, Pablo A. Olivera, Ijeoma Uchenna Itanyi, Vinyas Harish, Furong Tang, Emmalin Buajitti, Laura C. Rosella, Eric Benchimol

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Epidemiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMedical Coding and Health Information
Canadian institutionsTrillium Health CentreMcGill UniversitySinai Health SystemLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteMount Sinai HospitalWestern UniversityUniversity of TorontoSickKids FoundationPublic Health Ontario
FundersHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of TorontoAmerican College of Gastroenterology
KeywordsCoding (social sciences)LimitingInflammatory bowel diseaseResidualHealth careHealthcare systemDiagnosis code

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Studying patterns of death, particularly premature deaths (<75 years), provides insights to address health inequities among those living. Multiple coding systems for cause of death (COD) exist. The Leading Causes of Death (LCD) scheme is designed for identifying priority COD for interventions in global populations. The extent to which such classification is effective for identifying priority causes of premature mortality among subpopulations with chronic health conditions, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the usability of the LCD for characterizing premature mortality among those with IBD. Methods: We conducted a population-based matched case control study of persons with IBD who died between 2010 and 2018 using linked health administrative data from Ontario, Canada. Individuals with IBD were matched with five decedents without IBD based on sex and years of birth and death. We compared COD for premature and overall mortality using two classification structures: the LCD scheme and the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, tenth revision (ICD-10) chapters. Results: Among 7,919 decedents with IBD (39,414 matched controls), 47% died prematurely. With the LCD framework, COD differences for premature mortality were not detectable as 29% were allocated to the residual category (Standardized differences [SD]: 18%). Most residual deaths were due to neoplasms (34%) or diseases of the gastrointestinal system (32%). Using ICD-10 chapters, premature deaths were more commonly due to diseases of the digestive system than for matched controls (13% vs 5%, SD: 31%). Discussion: The LCD coding scheme provides more granular COD details compared to the ICD-10 chapters. However, a larger proportion of deaths among people with IBD were allocated to the residual category, limiting its utility for enabling healthcare systems to identify priority targets to reduce premature mortality. Further work to develop and validate a framework for premature COD classification in populations with IBD is needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.029
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.029
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.491
GPT teacher head0.549
Teacher spread0.058 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it