MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117422344 · doi:10.70082/ddpyef22

Effectiveness Of Root Canal Disinfection Protocols In Diabetic Versus Non-Diabetic Patients: A Systematic Review

2025· article· W7117422344 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Abrar Mohammed Ismail Qasim

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Review of Diabetic Studies · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldDentistry
TopicEndodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoot canalDiabetes mellitusPeriodontitisEndodonticsClinical trialRandomized controlled trialSodium hypochlorite

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been associated with impaired immune function, delayed tissue healing, and increased susceptibility to infections, including apical periodontitis (AP). Endodontic management in diabetic patients presents unique clinical challenges due to these systemic alterations. Objective: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of root canal disinfection protocols and the prevalence of AP in diabetic versus non-diabetic populations, integrating clinical, radiographic, and microbiological outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar for studies published between January 2010 and December 2025. Eligible studies included cross-sectional analyses, prospective cohorts, and randomized clinical trials comparing diabetic and non-diabetic patients undergoing root canal therapy. Data extraction focused on AP prevalence, disinfection efficacy, and post-treatment healing outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Results: Eleven studies met inclusion criteria. Diabetic patients consistently exhibited higher AP prevalence than non-diabetic controls (range: 13.5–74%). Type 1 and type 2 diabetes were associated with increased lesion persistence and delayed periapical healing. Controlled diabetes allowed for comparable healing outcomes following endodontic treatment. Enhanced irrigation techniques, including ultrasonic activation and photon-induced photoacoustic streaming, demonstrated superior microbial reduction compared to conventional syringe irrigation. Lower concentrations of sodium hypochlorite (1%) were effective and safe for periapical tissues. Conclusion: Diabetes mellitus predisposes patients to higher AP prevalence and may compromise root canal healing, particularly in poorly controlled cases. Optimized disinfection protocols and meticulous clinical techniques are essential for successful outcomes. Integration of systemic health assessment with endodontic management is recommended to enhance both oral and systemic health in diabetic populations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.535
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Review of Diabetic StudiesSame topicEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207