MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117451881 · doi:10.5737/23688076356828

Psychosocial needs of parents with children suffering from cancer in Rwanda: A cross-sectional study

2025· article· W7117451881 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emmanuella Mukambonyi, Joseph Imanishimwe, Japhet Ishimwe, Parfait Ndizeye, Samuel Ishimwe, Jean Baptiste Niyombabazi, Vedaste Baziga, Peace Uwambaye, Margaret I. Fitch

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Oncology Nursing Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychosocialPsychological interventionCoping (psychology)Social supportGriefDescriptive statisticsNeeds assessmentPediatric cancerChildhood cancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Each year, approximately 400,000 children between the ages of 0 and 19 are diagnosed with cancer worldwide. The parents of these children experience heightened psychosocial challenges while managing their care throughout the treatment process. Recognizing these needs is essential for creating targeted interventions. This research project aimed to explore the psychosocial needs of parents with children undergoing cancer treatment. Methodology: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted to gather data from 100 parents or caregivers of children who received cancer treatment at Butaro Cancer Center of Excellence. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics with SPSS version29. Results: Participants faced significant psychosocial challenges, including managing emotions, such as anxiety, fear, and grief (Mean (M) = 2.2, Standard deviation (SD) = 1.45) and seeking peace of mind (M = 2.1, SD = 1.42), with 28% and 33% reporting extreme effects on emotional support and coping mechanisms. Informational needs were also a concern, as 29% felt uninformed about community resources (M = 2.20, SD = 1.428). Social support needs were notable, particularly the necessity of having someone to stay with the child (M = 2.57, SD = 1.53) was extremely important for 46% of the participants. Financial assistance to cover additional expenses was another challenge, with a mean score of 2.30, reflecting its critical importance. Conclusion: This study offers important insights into the psychosocial needs of parents with children diagnosed with cancer, in Rwanda. Addressing and prioritizing these needs, while creating tailored interventions that target the identified areas, could improve the holistic care significantly and promote interventions to meet the psychosocial needs of parents of children suffering from cancer. Keywords: parents, childhood cancer, psychosocial needs, information needs, financial needs

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.386
Teacher spread0.359 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Oncology Nursing JournalSame topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of LifeFrench-language works237,207