APOIO FAMILIAR COMO FATOR DETERMINANTE NO DESENVOLVIMENTO NEUROPSICOMOTOR NA SÍNDROME DE DOWN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Down syndrome is a genetic alteration resulting from trisomy of chromosome 21 and is associated with delays in motor development, muscle hypotonia, postural alterations, and difficulties in body control. This study aimed to analyze the physiotherapeutic evolution of a 1-year-old female child diagnosed with Down syndrome and treated at the Physiotherapy Teaching Clinic. This is a case study conducted through a complete evaluation involving anamnesis, postural analysis, joint tests, muscle strength assessment, anthropometric measurements, primitive reflexes, and application of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS), which indicated a three-month motor delay in relation to chronological age. The therapeutic plan was structured focusing on early stimulation techniques, sensory integration, cervical and trunk control exercises, rolling training, facilitation of motor development, and play activities to promote engagement and functional response. Throughout the follow-up, significant progress was observed, such as improved trunk control, greater stability in sitting, initiation of independent lateral rolling, increased joint range of motion, and better response to sensorimotor stimuli. Reassessment also demonstrated improved motor coordination, overall strengthening, and development of functional skills, evidencing good family adherence and continuity of home-based stimulation. The findings of this study reinforce that early and systematic physiotherapy intervention significantly contributes to the motor development of children with Down syndrome, promoting greater autonomy, better postural organization, and advancement in neuropsychomotor acquisitions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".