BORIS CHRUBASIK, JUDITH K. SCHUTZ, ANDREW MEADOWS and JAROSŁAW BODZEK (eds.)Coinage in Imperial Space: Coins in the Economy of the Achaemenid and Early Hellenistic World, Phoenix 76 (2022), Journal of the Classical Association of Canada, Toronto, ON 2023, 310 pages; ISSN 0031-8299
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From 28 June to 2 July 2017, the Emeryk Hutten-Czapski’s Museum hosted an international conference entitled “Coinage in Imperial Space: Continuity or Change from the Achaemenid to Hellenistic Kingdoms?”. The conference was organised by the Institute of Archaeology of the Jagiellonian University, the Faculty of Classics at the University of Oxford, and the National Museum in Krakow. The event was also accompanied by the exhibition “Coin and Empire: From the Achaemenid Empire to the Hellenistic Kingdoms” prepared by Jarosław Bodzek from National Museum in Krakow and Andrzej Romanowski from National Museum in Warsaw.1 In addition to the very fruitful discussions, the conference resulted in this above book, published as the Phoenix special volume, Journal of the Classical Association of Canada. It contains 12 articles by some of the most outstanding contemporary specialists in ancient numismatics, dealing with coinage from Achaemenid times to the Hellenistic period in the context of ps.-Aristotle’s Oikonomika. Abstracts of the individual texts are provided at the end of the volume.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".