Spatiotemporal distribution and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the Tigris River near Baghdad Medical City wastewater discharge
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are persistent, carcinogenic contaminants.We tracked the 16 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) priority PAHs in surface waters of the Tigris River at five stations spanning 100 m upstream to 1.5 km downstream of Baghdad Medical City's wastewater outfall during October 2024, January 2025, and April 2025.Samples underwent liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), copper desulfurization, and gas chromatography with flame-ionization detector (GC-FID) analysis.Total PAH concentrations (16 PAHs) peaked at the sewer outlet in all seasons (up to 31 g L) and declined at 1.5 km downstream to levels close to the pre-sewage discharge point.Site explained 93.75% of the spatiotemporal variance (p < 0.001).The share of high-molecular-weight PAHs rose from 48% at the outfall to 67% after 1.5 km.Total risk quotient (RQ) peaked at 2.5 10 in January, exceeding the safety threshold, while benzo[a]pyrene-equivalent toxicity (BaP-TEQ) peaked at 1.9 g BaP eq L.Winter benzo[a]pyrene (0.262 g L) exceeded Dutch and Canadian aquatic criteria by 17-26-fold.Diagnostic ratios trace the origin of PAHs to medical waste and biomass combustion
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it