Endocan as a Novel Biomarker for Endothelial Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Prognosis in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Contemporary Literature Review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The pathophysiology of ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI) extends beyond coronary artery occlusion to include microvascular and endothelial dysfunction, both of which critically influence outcomes. Endocan, a soluble dermatan sulfate proteoglycan secreted by endothelial cells, has emerged as a novel biomarker of endothelial activation and dysfunction. Recent studies suggest that elevated endocan levels may carry prognostic significance in patients with STEMI, particularly those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was conducted to identify studies evaluating endocan as a prognostic biomarker in STEMI. Review articles, case reports, case series, and experimental studies were excluded. Seven clinical studies, comprising sample sizes ranging from 80 to 320 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Across these studies, endocan levels were analyzed in relation to established prognostic markers and clinical outcomes. Key findings demonstrated that higher endocan levels correlated with stress hyperglycemia (r = 0.21, p < 0.05), higher SYNTAX scores, and worse in-hospital outcomes. A cutoff value of 1.7 ng/mL predicted STEMI with 76.1% sensitivity and 73.6% specificity. Elevated endocan levels also showed positive correlations with the TIMI risk score, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and were identified as independent predictors of incomplete ST-segment resolution (STR) (p = 0.044) and no-reflow phenomenon (NRP) (p < 0.001, OR = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.37–4.15). Collectively, the evidence indicates that endocan is strongly associated with endothelial dysfunction, MACE, NRP post-PCI, and impaired reperfusion. Moreover, traditional prognostic indices such as TIMI and SYNTAX scores appear to correlate with circulating endocan levels. However, variability in reported cutoff values across studies highlights the need for larger, multicenter trials with standardized endpoints to establish endocan’s diagnostic and prognostic utility in STEMI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it