Newton’s gravitational constant <i>G</i> is the product of two natural constants, which explains the “anomalous” increase in the eccentricity of the lunar orbit
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neither Einstein nor other Nobel laureates in physics recognized that Newton’s gravitational constant G is the product of two natural constants, one of which is the constant c : G = G q × c 2 = (7.426 16 × 10 −28 m kg −1 ) × c 2 = 6.6743 × 10 −11 m 3 kg −1 s −2 . Therefore, the constant c and the constant G q , which I called the “quantum physical gravitational constant G q ,” are factors of Newton’s law of gravity, which applies in three-dimensional space. Einstein, who did not recognize this, mixed quantum physical properties of matter and photons in his equations in general relativity in order to calculate the specific length scale defined by a certain mass M in the geometry of spacetime: l g = G / c 2 × M = G q × M . Einstein, without knowing it, transformed the quantum physical gravitational constant G q of Newton’s law of gravity into a gravitational constant in four-dimensional spacetime. General relativity provides correct numerical results that do not correspond with physical reality, since the quantum physical gravitational constant G q is a factor of Newton’s law of gravity, which applies in three-dimensional space. If we modify Newton’s theory of gravity by calculating with the quantum physical gravitational constant G q and the constant c squared instead of the gravitational constant G , the intrinsic properties of masses (matter) become visible and the same gravitational phenomena arise in three-dimensional space that are currently derived from Einstein’s general relativity, e.g., the correct precession of Mercury’s perihelion, the deflection of light around massive objects, and gravitational phenomena observed in binary pulsars. The advanced quantized Newtonian theory of gravity is superior to general relativity because it provides a quantum physical explanation for mass-energy equivalence, because its mathematics is simple, and because it explains the anomalous increase in the eccentricity of the Moon’s orbit and the so-called “dark matter.”
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".