MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117478221 · doi:10.31385/jl.v24i2.714.244-259

Kôwelidē: An Inculturative Ecotheology A Study of Postcolonial Theology in the Death Rites of the Yei People in South Papua - Indonesia

2025· article· W7117478221 on OpenAlexaff
Maximilian Boas Pegan, Avelinus Moat Simon, Godfridus Cindu Kosnan, Fransiskus Asisi Wanda Batlayeri

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ledalero · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Ecology, and Ethics
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelation (database)Qualitative researchHuman lifeEthnography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p><em>Understanding and engaging with culture is essential for developing local theology. Every culture contains unique traditions and practices that embody noble values, some of which align closely with Christian teachings. Many cultural rituals hold deep significance for human life and reflect the community’s worldview, ethics, and spirituality. This article explores the noble values embedded in the local culture of the Yei people from South Papua, Indonesia, particularly in relation to their significant efforts to preserve the integrity of God’s creation. One crucial tradition, kôwelidē, is performed during death rites and incorporates practices aimed at environmental preservation. This study employs qualitative research methods, drawing on a postcolonial theology approach, to uncover the ecological wisdom of the Yei people. The research findings highlight a deep-rooted concept of environmental stewardship, which is then developed into a framework of inculturation of ecotheology. This approach integrates the lived experiences of the Yei people with theological reflections on nature conservation, emphasising a harmonious relationship between faith, culture, and environmental responsibility.</em></p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.232
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal LedaleroSame topicReligion, Ecology, and EthicsFrench-language works237,207