MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117479061 · doi:10.1093/bjs/znaf270.077

259 Complete Pathological Response to Pembrolizumab in Locally Advanced Oesophageal Cancer: A Case Study

2025· article· en· W7117479061 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah Epton, Katrina Forsyth, James Gossage

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish journal of surgery · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPembrolizumabCapecitabineCarboplatinDocetaxelDysphagiaChemotherapyPathologicalAdenocarcinomaLymph nodeCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Pembrolizumab was approved by NICE in 2021 for use with platinum- and fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced unresectable, or metastatic PD-L1 expressing carcinoma of the oesophagus. We describe a case of locally advanced oesophageal adenocarcinoma in which treatment with pembrolizumab resulted in a complete pathological response. Case Presentation A 70-year-old gentleman presented with T3N2M0 moderately differentiated lower oesophageal adenocarcinoma. He underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT), resulting in a partial radiological response. Upon completion of neoadjuvant therapy, the tumour was deemed operable, however the patient initially declined surgery. Surveillance imaging at three months demonstrated disease progression. Eight cycles of carboplatin and capecitabine were then completed. Although initially radiologically stable, subsequent disease progression resulted in dysphagia. Pembrolizumab was started and continued for six months. Three months into treatment, worsening dysphagia prompted oesophageal stenting, with only temporary symptomatic relief and nasojejunal feeding was commenced. Restaging PET-CT demonstrated operable disease, with focal uptake adjacent to the primary tumour and ongoing left gastric node avidity. The patient underwent an uncomplicated robotic-assisted oesophagogastrectomy. Final histopathology revealed a complete pathological response, with no residual tumour, dysplasia, or lymph node involvement. Conclusions This case demonstrates the use of pembrolizumab in the management of patients with PD-L1 expressing oesophageal carcinoma and highlights the evolving role of immunotherapy in oesophagogastric cancer treatment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.643

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBritish journal of surgerySame topicEsophageal Cancer Research and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207