MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Robosurg: Resilience of Vision-Language Models Against Adversarial Attacks in Robotic Surgery

2025· article· W7117482120 on OpenAlexaff
Ufaq Khan, Umair Nawaz, Mustaqeem Khan, Abdulmotaleb El Saddik

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdversarial systemRobustness (evolution)Resilience (materials science)Context (archaeology)CompromiseAdversarial machine learningRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and visionlanguage models (VLMs) is revolutionizing robotic-assisted surgeries by enhancing decision-making and operational precision. Despite these advances, the robustness of VLMs against adversarial attacks, particularly in surgical scene understanding via Visual Question Answering (VQA), is not well understood. These models are integral to surgical accuracy but may be vulnerable to data perturbations that can compromise patient outcomes. This paper introduces RoboSurg, a framework designed to protect VLMs against such adversarial threats in surgical environments. We tailor adversarial attacks to the surgical domain, exposing significant vulnerabilities in widely used models such as SurgicalGPT, BLIP, BLIP-2, and CLIP-ViL. RoboSurg incorporates multimodal adversarial training, advanced input preprocessing, and targeted architectural modifications to enhance the strength of these models. Our experimental results demonstrate that RoboSurg effectively lowers the impact of adversarial threats while maintaining model performance under normal operating conditions. Furthermore, the first study of adversarial attacks on VLMs in a surgical context is presented in this paper, and bringing AI solutions to the forefront of safety and reliability marks a significant achievement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.936
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdversarial Robustness in Machine LearningFrench-language works237,207