Exploring the Feasibility of a Vestibular/Oculomotor Caregiver-Supervised Exercise Program in Children Post Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore the feasibility of a vestibular/oculomotor caregiver-supervised exercise program in children post moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: The study included 37 children aged 6-18 years, with a median of 42-days post moderate-severe TBI. The intervention-group participated in a vestibular/oculomotor caregiver-supervised exercise program for 8 weeks; the control-group continued with standard-care only. Feasibility was evaluated based on the number of adverse-events and practices reported, and the ability to perform assessments. Vestibular/oculomotor function was evaluated by the number abnormal tests in the Vestibular/Ocular-Motor-Screening. Balance was evaluated by the Pediatric Balance Scale and Functional-Gait-Assessment. RESULTS: All participants completed the tests and no adverse-events were observed during the study. However, only 6 participants in the intervention-group performed ≥80% of the recommended practice. All assessments were significantly improved (P < .05) in both groups, with no significant differences between them. CONCLUSIONS: Although the vestibular/oculomotor caregiver-supervised intervention program was safe, the cooperation-rate was low, indicating difficulties with feasibility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".