MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117532609 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18082629

Time to Positivity of Blood Cultures and Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2025· article· W7117532609 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fareya Haider

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and Maternal Infections
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSepsisObservational studyNeonatal sepsisCohort studyBlood cultureClinical significanceCohortAdverse effect

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Time to positivity (TTP) of blood cultures reflects bacterial burden and growth kinetics and may have prognostic value in sepsis. While adult data suggest that shorter TTP is associated with adverse outcomes, its clinical significance in pediatric and neonatal sepsis remains less clearly defined. Objectives: To synthesize current evidence on (1) the distribution of blood-culture TTP in pediatric sepsis and (2) the association between TTP and clinical outcomes, including mortality and illness severity. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA principles. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched from inception to June 2025 for studies including patients aged 0–18 years with suspected or confirmed sepsis that reported TTP using automated blood-culture systems. Eligible designs were observational cohort or case–control studies reporting at least one clinical outcome. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed for comparable effect estimates. Results: Fifty-five studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, of which 18 contributed quantitative outcome data. Across studies, 70–85% of clinically significant cultures became positive within 24 h, 90–95% within 36 h, and >95% within 48 h. Neonatal cohorts-particularly very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants-demonstrated shorter TTP in Gram-negative sepsis and a consistent association between short TTP and adverse outcomes. Meta-analysis showed that short TTP was significantly associated with higher neonatal mortality (pooled OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.32–2.61; I² = 48%), with similar results in sensitivity analysis. In older children, short TTP showed a stronger association with illness severity than mortality (pooled OR for severity 2.07, 95% CI 1.51–2.84; I² = 42%), with heterogeneous mortality effects across cohorts. Conclusions: Most clinically meaningful pediatric blood cultures flag positive within 24–36 hours, supporting earlier review of empirical antibiotics in clinically improving, culture-negative patients. Short TTP is a clinically relevant prognostic marker, strongly associated with mortality in neonatal sepsis and with illness severity in older children. Standardized TTP thresholds, sampling practices, and prospective multicenter validation are needed to support routine integration of TTP into pediatric sepsis risk stratification and stewardship pathways

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.034
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.034
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0200.043
Bibliometrics0.0070.009
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsFrench-language works237,207