Costs of Treating Uncomplicated Sickle Cell Complications in a Day Hospital Setting in Equatorial Africa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a major public health concern in Africa. SCD healthcare expenses are covered by personal finances in the Congo due to the absence of universal public health insurance. Various strategies have been implemented to minimize this economic burden, including an outpatient management strategy. The present study evaluated the costs associated with outpatient management of uncomplicated sickle cell crises. Patients presenting to the National Sickle Cell Center's emergency room between December 2023 and February 2024 were included in this study for a total of 114 subjects with uncomplicated crises from SCD. Chief complaint, diagnosis, treatment, health insurance coverage, and cost of care were recorded for each subject. We further assessed the consistency of treatment with published standards of care. Mean patient age was 16 ± 13 years, where more than one-third were adults (36.5%). The ratio of males to females was 1.09. Only 26.2% were employed. Monthly income was lower in individuals with SCD ($310.32 ± 120.93) compared to those without SCD ($386.92 ± 471). Managing uncomplicated SCD as an outpatient costs an average of $99.86 ± 49, where medications represented 55.7% of the total expense. Sixty-six patients (57%) received prescription medications and investigation with no rational basis, resulting in an inflated cost of $15.96 per person. The present study did not demonstrate any financial benefits to managing uncomplicated SCD in outpatient settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".