Efficacy of antioxidant supplementation in alleviating endometriosis-related pain: insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endometriosis, a chronic inflammatory disorder, is a leading cause of pelvic pain and reduced quality of life in women, with oxidative stress implicated in its pathogenesis. While antioxidant supplementation has been proposed as a potential therapeutic strategy, its clinical efficacy remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the impact of antioxidants on endometriosis-related pain outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, and clinical trial registries (2000–January 2025) was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effect of any oral antioxidant supplement, without dose or duration restrictions, in endometriosis patients and reporting quantitative data on at least one of the primary pain outcomes (dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, or chronic pelvic pain). Primary outcomes included dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and chronic pelvic pain. Study risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool, and evidence certainty was graded via the GRADE framework. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to estimate pooled effects. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of available RCTs suggested a potential reduction in pain scores for dysmenorrhea (SMD = − 1.26, 95% CI: −2.19 to − 0.32) and chronic pelvic pain (SMD = − 1.07, 95% CI: −1.71 to − 0.42); however, extreme heterogeneity (I² > 90%) in these analyses indicates that these average effects are highly uncertain and should not be generalized specific clinical contexts. No significant effect was observed for dyspareunia. Subgroup analyses indicated that melatonin may be associated with the most consistent potential pain reduction. CONCLUSION: Current low- to very low-certainty evidence suggests that antioxidant supplementation, particularly melatonin, may be associated with improvements in dysmenorrhea and chronic pelvic pain in endometriosis. However, due to considerable inconsistency and methodological limitations across studies, these findings must be interpreted with caution. The results underscore the urgent need for high-quality, large-scale RCTs to confirm any potential benefits and define the clinical role of antioxidants in endometriosis management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".