MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117563652 · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2025.121081

A systematic review of ketamine and esketamine-induced long-term potentiation and synaptic scaling: Do the molecular and synaptic plasticity effects inform dosing intervals?

2025· article· en· W7117563652 on OpenAlexaff
Gia Han Le, Sabrina Wong, Danica E. Johnson, Andy Lu, Diana Orsini, Noah Chisamore, Sara D Di Luch, Joshua D. Rosenblat, Roger S. McIntyre

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Affective Disorders · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTreatment of Major Depression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity Health NetworkBrain and Cognition Discovery Foundation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDosingKetamineLong-term potentiationAntidepressantTreatment-resistant depressionSynaptic plasticityNeuroplasticityPreclinical research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ketamine and esketamine exhibit rapid antidepressant effects in persons with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and bipolar depression (TRBD). However, the synaptic mechanisms governing dose, frequency, and durability of response remain unclear. This review aims to evaluate the dosing parameters, including minimum dose and optimal dosing intervals, that reliably induce or maintain long-term potentiation (LTP) and/or synaptic scaling in humans and preclinical models. A systematic search (database inception to June 2025) was conducted on OVID and PubMed to identify preclinical and clinical studies reporting ketamine-induced clinical symptom changes alongside direct or indirect marker of LTP and/or synaptic scaling. Study selection, quality assessment, and data extraction were conducted by two independent reviewers. Sixty-one clinical and 17 preclinical studies met inclusion criteria. Most clinical studies enrolled persons with TRD, with fewer including TRBD or mixed TRD/TRBD samples. In TRD, a single 0.5 mg/kg intravenous ketamine infusion produced rapid but transient antidepressant effects, peaking at 24-hours and declining over 2-3 days. A similar temporal pattern was observed in TRBD. Early neurophysiological changes emerged within 3-8-hours, consolidated by 24-hours, and were sparsely detected beyond 3-days post-ketamine treatment. Consistent neurophysiological findings were observed in preclinical models. Across clinical trials, twice- versus thrice-weekly dosing yielded comparable four-week outcomes, and weekly maintenance significantly reduced relapse risk. Ketamine may open a plasticity window lasting approximately 2-3 days. Dosing intervals aligned with this window during an acute course of treatment, informed by rapid neurophysiological markers, may optimize antidepressant durability and response while minimizing drug exposure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.032
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.008
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Affective DisordersSame topicTreatment of Major DepressionFrench-language works237,207