MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117568319 · doi:10.2967/jnumed.125.270814

BANTAM-01: A Multicenter, Open-Label, First-in-Human Phase 1 Dose Escalation and Expansion Study of <sup>225</sup> Ac-GPC3 (BAY 3547926) in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

2025· article· en· W7117568319 on OpenAlexaff
Jorrit Tjeertes, Miroslav Dostálek, Charles Glaus, Vinita Gupta, Daneng Li, Antje Nestler, Vasiliki Pelekanou, Joerg Pinkert, Ida Ratih, Eric E. Smith, S.V. Subramanyam, Arndt Vogel, Katrina Walker, Andrea Wilson Woods, Stefan Zimmermann, Henrik Junger

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreOntario Institute for Cancer Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHepatocellular carcinomaLimitingCancerGlypican 3DiseaseCarcinomaClinical trialSorafenib

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the increasing availability of systemic therapies to treat advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the prognosis remains poor. There is therefore an unmet need for targeted therapies with a novel mode of action that are more tolerable and effective than current treatment options. Targeted α-therapies selectively deliver high-energy α-particle–emitting radionuclides to tumor-associated cell surface antigens, inducing difficult-to-repair DNA double-stranded breaks, while limiting damage to surrounding tissue. Elevated expression of the oncofetal cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycan, glypican-3 (GPC3), is seen in more than 70% of HCCs and is a negative prognostic indicator. BAY 3547926 (225Ac-GPC3) is an 225Ac-labeled antibody–chelator conjugate (ACC) that delivers 225Ac directly to GPC3-expressing cancer cells and is a potential first-in-class targeted α-therapy in advanced HCC. Methods: This multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized first-in-human phase 1 dose escalation and expansion study aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of 225Ac-GPC3 ACC, with or without preinjection of the nonradioactive GPC3 ACC, in participants with advanced HCC. The study has 3 parts: dose escalation, dose expansion as monotherapy, and safety run-in and dose expansion in combination with standard of care. Key eligibility criteria include diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic and/or unresectable HCC, with disease not amenable to, or progressive disease after, curative surgery and/or locoregional therapies. To ensure only participants who are good candidates to benefit from 225Ac-GPC3 ACC enter the study, participants will be prospectively screened to confirm GPC3 membrane expression in a tumor specimen. All participants will receive study treatment on day 1 of a 6-wk cycle; additionally, participants in part 3 will receive standard-of-care treatment at the usual frequency. Participants will receive up to 4 doses of the study intervention, unless withdrawn from the study on disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or fulfillment of any other withdrawal criteria. Primary endpoints include assessment of the occurrence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events, recommended dose, objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, and progression-free survival. Conclusion: Study recruitment commenced in March 2025, and approximately 148 participants will be enrolled. The study will provide important preliminary insights on the efficacy and safety of 225Ac-GPC3 ACC therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Nuclear MedicineSame topicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisFrench-language works237,207