Hubungan pengetahuan dengan penanganan dismenore pada remaja putri
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Latar Belakang: Dismenore merupakan nyeri haid yang sering dialami remaja putri dan dapat mengganggu aktivitas sehari-hari, termasuk proses belajar. Penanganan dismenore dapat dilakukan secara farmakologis maupun nonfarmakologis, namun masih banyak remaja yang belum mengetahui cara penanganan yang tepat. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui hubungan pengetahuan dengan penanganan dismenore pada remaja putri di SMKN 1 Mataram.Metode: Jenis desain penelitian observasional analitik dengan pendekatan cross sectional. Populasi adalah seluruh siswi kelas X yang mengalami dismenore, dengan total sampel 31 responden menggunakan total sampling. Instrumen berupa kuesioner pengetahuan dan penanganan dismenore. Analisis menggunakan uji Chi-Square.Hasil: Hasil menunjukkan mayoritas responden memiliki pengetahuan cukup (77,4%) dan penanganan kurang (54,8%). Uji Chi-Square menghasilkan p=0,194 (p>0,05), artinya tidak terdapat hubungan signifikan antara pengetahuan dengan penanganan dismenore.Kesimpulan: Pengetahuan yang cukup tidak selalu berbanding lurus dengan perilaku penanganan. Diperlukan edukasi kesehatan reproduksi lebih lanjut bagi remaja agar dapat melakukan penanganan dismenore dengan tepat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".