Dewatering Hypersaline Na2SO4 and NaCl via Commercial Forward Osmosis Module
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Efficient water recycling in the hydrometallurgical industry requires the dewatering of hypersaline Na2SO4 or similar brines via non-evaporative methods. Unfortunately, many non-evaporative methods require the use of specific solutes and are not compatible with complex hydrometallurgical effluents. Forward Osmosis (FO) uses a draw solution to link known non-evaporative water recycling methods with feed solutions that are otherwise incompatible. There is minimal experimental data on the dewatering performance of today’s available commercial FO membranes, especially with hypersaline concentrations (>70,000 mg/L total dissolved solids). This study tests the commercially available Aquaporin HFFO2 hollow fibre FO membrane module with hypersaline Na2SO4 or NaCl feed solutions versus a MgCl2 draw solution. It identifies a key requirement to maintain water flux above a certain threshold to prevent a decrease in Na Rejection or an increase in Mg reverse flux. It also defines a minimum osmotic differential that can be used to parameterize water flux, similar to the temperature of approach in heat exchangers, but to determine the extent of water removal in FO. We demonstrate that even under mildly acidic conditions, existing FO membranes can concentrate Na2SO4 to saturation, paving the way for their use in the hydrometallurgical industry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".