Twenty years of the International Conferences on Photosynthesis and Hydrogen Energy Research for Sustainability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The International Conference on "Photosynthesis and Hydrogen Energy Research" was inaugurated in 2004 in Trois Rivières, Canada, as "Photosynthesis and Post-Genomics Era". It was conceived by its founders, Suleyman I. Allakhverdiev (Russia), Vyacheslav (Slava) Klimov (Russia), Robert Carpentier (Canada), and Prasanna Mohanty (India) to be an alternating conference to the bigger International Congress on Photosynthesis, which was then held every three years. The name was changed to the International Conference on Photosynthesis (ICP) in 2011. In 2013, "Hydrogen Production" was added, and then finally the current name, "International Conference on Photosynthesis and Hydrogen Energy Research for Sustainability", was used in 2015. The conferences over the last twenty years have been held in three continents - North America, Europe, and Asia - and have been very successful in attracting participants with the latest ideas in photosynthesis, hydrogen production, and energy sustainability. Here we describe all 12 conferences, with details of the major events of each conference. Major points of the conference were: (1) Recent advances in the understanding of the basic mechanisms of water splitting (photosystem II) and the reactions around photosystem I in photosynthetic organisms. (2) The role of hydrogen production in photosynthesis. (3) The role of innovations in photosynthesis and hydrogen production in the development of global sustainability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".