MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7117710697 · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-26046-0

Inequitable morbidity and injuries burden among informal sector workers in an urban area in Dhaka: a retrospective analysis of Médecins Sans Frontières occupational health clinics, Bangladesh, 2014–2023

2025· article· en· W7117710697 on OpenAlexaff
Grazia Caleo, Sohana Sadique, Debbie Malden, Martins Femi Dada, Jobin Joseph, Kalyan Velivela, Salim Mahmud Chowdhury, Christabel Mayienga, Tasmia Shenjuti, Gayathrie Sadacharamani, Rezwanur Rahman Masum, Mark Sherlock, Hamza Atim, Patrick Keating

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicOccupational Health and Safety Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOccupational safety and healthWorkforceBiostatisticsPublic healthInformal sectorEpidemiologySuicide preventionDescriptive statisticsPoison control

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: In Bangladesh, 85% of the workforce is employed in the informal sector, characterised by unsafe working conditions, low wages, and a lack of social and labour protections. Evidence on the health and occupational injuries faced by informal sector workers is limited. This study assessed the health status of informal sector workers in Dhaka’s Kamrangirchar area, where Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) has provided occupational health (OH) services and provides evidence to inform policy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using OH data from two MSF clinics, covering patients aged ≥ 18 years from February 2014 to December 2023. We performed a descriptive analysis, stratified by sex, using chi-squared tests to identify differences in health status by key characteristics, including patient demographics such as age and sex, factory type, work-related morbidity, injuries, nutritional status, and mental health. The analysis was limited to new consultations. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2023, 64,467 OH consultations occurred among adults aged ≥ 18 years, of which 23,874 were new consultations with sex data available (self-reported); 38.6% were women. Women were more likely to work in plastics (35.7% vs. 24.4%) and garment (28.8% vs. 18.9%) factories, whereas men were predominated in leather factories (17.5% vs. 7.8%). Machinery operation was reported by 92.8% of men and 91.5% of women. Work-related conditions accounted for 90.5% of all visits. The most common diagnoses for both sexes were musculoskeletal disorders (30.3%) and gastrointestinal conditions (22.7%). Injuries represented 4.3% of new consultations, with a higher proportion in men (6.0% vs. 1.8%), and 60% of injuries occurred in metal factories. Malnutrition affected 16.7% of men and 12.5% of women. Among 561 patients with mental health outcomes, mood disorders were more frequent in women (92% vs. 84%). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the significant work-related health burden faced by urban informal sector workers operating in hazardous environments, with gender-based differences. Urgent gender-sensitive workspace safety, social and mental health, and nutritional initiatives are needed. Ratifying the International Labour Organization Conventions C189 and C190, which aim to provide informal workers with the same protection as those in the formal sector, would be a crucial step toward safeguarding workers’ rights and well-being.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.360 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC Public Health→Same topicOccupational Health and Safety Research→French-language works237,207→