MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117739103 · doi:10.1002/qj.70098

Thermodynamic and microphysical properties of summertime marine fog observed from Sable Island

2025· article· en· W7117739103 on OpenAlexaff
Kelsey Rowe, Jesus Ruiz‐Plancarte, Ryan Yamaguchi, David G. Ortiz‐Suslow, Eric R. Pardyjak, Ismail Gültepe, H. J. Fernando, Q. Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
FundersOffice of Naval Research
KeywordsRadiosondeVisibilityAdvectionStratification (seeds)PrecipitationWarm frontAttenuationPrecipitable water

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study focuses on the physical processes in marine fog and its impact on optical attenuation using measurements from Sable Island during the 2022 FATIMA Grand Banks field campaign. The analyses used the water‐droplet size distribution from a fog monitor (FM‐120) and the meteorological optical range (MOR) measured by a present weather sensor (PWD22) as primary data sources, augmented by frequent radiosonde launches collocated with other FATIMA instruments. Analyses of the frequent radiosonde launches revealed the presence of fog associated with frequent frontal passages throughout the intensive measurement period. Based on the 35 days of microphysics measurements, we also identified and analyzed nine reduced visibility events (RVEs) when the mean MOR was less than 1 km. Furthermore, the data were categorized based on the weather code to characterize the observed hydrometeor further into clear, mist, fog, and precipitation categories. This study shows evidence of persistent stable thermal stratification in the fog layer, often accompanied with low‐level jets in or above the fog layer. The droplet spectra in fog indicated a bimodal distribution below the droplet size of 50 m. Our results also show a consistent power‐law relationship between visibility and fog liquid water content for pure marine advection fog events, which are different from coastal fog, only. In particular, a power‐law fit seems to resemble closely the theoretical relationship given by previous studies of the marine fog.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.963
Threshold uncertainty score0.075

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological SocietySame topicAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsFrench-language works237,207