MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117740542 · doi:10.1002/jgc4.70157

Intersex community perspectives on prenatal sex chromosome screening: “It silences intersex”

2025· article· en· W7117740542 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Louis Canavan, Darius Haghighat, Bria Brown‐King, Hannah Llorin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Genetic Counseling · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSexual Differentiation and Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMGH Institute of Health Professions
KeywordsDisorders of sex developmentThematic analysisDiversity (politics)Genetic counselingHealth careTransgenderMen who have sex with menPublic healthPrenatal care

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intersex individuals and/or individuals with variations in sex characteristics (VSC)/differences in sex development (DSD), who will be referred to from this point forward as individuals with I/VSC, have sex characteristics that do not fit within the binary framework of sex. This community has historically been marginalized in healthcare due to the pathologization of intersex variations, including nonconsensual sex "normalizing" medical interventions. While previous research has explored the perspectives of individuals who are transgender and/or gender-diverse on counseling about fetal sex chromosomes by healthcare providers (HCPs), there is limited information on the recommendations of individuals with I/VSC for genetic counseling on prenatal sex chromosome screening. Sixteen semi-structured individual interviews were conducted virtually with members of the I/VSC community, a majority of whom identified as gender diverse, about their experiences in the United States and/or Canadian healthcare systems and their perspectives on how prenatal HCPs should counsel their patients on sex chromosomes, sex chromosome screening, and sex and gender. Participants were recruited through social media, and the majority resided in the United States. Using reflexive thematic analysis, four overarching themes were identified: (1) People with I/VSC face medical and societal discrimination; (2) Prenatal sex chromosome screening reinforces the sex binary; (3) HCPs have the potential to influence parental decision-making; and (4) HCPs should affirm sex and gender diversity. Participants expressed that there is a lack of HCP education on both intersex variations and gender diversity that has led to members of these communities experiencing a variety of harms. Our findings suggest that prenatal HCPs have a responsibility to educate themselves in order to provide patients with I/VSC and/or who are gender diverse, as well as their families, with appropriate care. Additionally, participants emphasized that systemic and societal change is necessary for ending the stigma and discrimination that individuals with I/VSC and/or who are gender-diverse face.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.634
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Genetic CounselingSame topicSexual Differentiation and DisordersFrench-language works237,207