MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117744385 · doi:10.3390/rs18010127

Assessing the Impact of T-Mart Adjacency Effect Correction on Turbidity Retrieval from Landsat 8/9 and Sentinel-2 Imagery (Case Study: St. Lawrence River, Canada)

2025· article· en· W7117744385 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Mohsen Ansari, Yulun Wu, Anders Knudby

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal ecosystems
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersMitacs
KeywordsTurbidityMean squared errorAtmospheric correctionReflectivitySatelliteAdjacency listApproximation errorError analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In inland waters, Atmospheric Correction (AC), including Adjacency Effect (AE) correction, is a major challenge for water quality retrieval using optical satellite data. This study evaluated three image pre-processing options for turbidity retrieval in the St. Lawrence River using Sentinel-2 (S2) and Landsat 8/9 (L8/9) imagery with the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model: (1) No pre-processing, i.e., use of Top-of-Atmosphere (TOA) reflectance, (2) AC pre-processing, obtaining water-leaving reflectance (Rw) from AC for the Operational Land Imager lite (ACOLITE)’s Dark Spectrum Fitting (DSF) technique, and (3) AE pre-processing, correcting for the AE using T-Mart before obtaining Rw from DSF. Results demonstrated that AE pre-processing outperformed the other two options. For L8/9, AE pre-processing reduced the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and improved the median symmetric accuracy (ε) by 48.8% and 19.0%, respectively, compared with AC pre-processing, and by 48.5% and 50.7%, respectively, compared with No pre-processing. For S2, AE pre-processing performed better than AC pre-processing and also outperformed No pre-processing, reducing RMSE by 28.4% and ε by 50.8%. However, No pre-processing yielded the lowest absolute symmetric signed percentage bias (|β|) among all pre-processing options. Analysis indicated that AE pre-processing yielded superior performance within 0–300 m from shore than other options, where the AE influence is strongest. Turbidity maps generated using AE pre-processing were smoother and less noisy compared to the other pre-processing options, particularly in cloud-adjacent regions. Overall, our findings suggest that incorporating AE correction through T-Mart improves the performance of the LightGBM model for turbidity retrieval from both L8/9 and S2 imagery in the St. Lawrence River, compared to the alternative pre-processing options.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicMarine and coastal ecosystemsFrench-language works237,207