MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117757535 · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a8952

Contralateral Brain Region Exhibits a Hemispheric Difference in Brain Dynamic Functional Connectivity in Patients with Chronic ICA Occlusion

2025· article· en· W7117757535 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Z.C. Wang, Y Liu, Haiyan Qian, Mi Shen, Can Cui, BinBin Sui

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Neuroradiology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFunctional connectivityOcclusionBrain mappingIndependent component analysisText mining

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Many imaging studies focused on the assessment of volume atrophy, structural damage, and abnormal functional connectivity (FC) in patients with carotid artery stenosis disease. Our purpose was to investigate the differences in dynamic functional connectivity within the contralateral brain in patients with chronic ICA occlusion using resting-state fMRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this trial, 21 patients with chronic occlusion of the ICA (17 men and 4 women) and 11 patients with chronic occlusion of the left ICA (10 men and 1 woman) underwent resting-state fMRI. The control group consisted of 10 healthy men and 6 healthy women. The Mini-Mental State Examination and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale were used to evaluate cognitive function. Cluster analysis and dynamic graph theory were used to analyze the dynamic functional connectivity data obtained through the sliding window method. RESULTS: The analysis of dynamic graph theory revealed that the regions affected in patients with occlusion of the right ICA primarily involved the primary motor sensory network (precentral gyrus and postcentral gyrus) and the anterior default network (orbital inferior frontal gyrus and anterior cingulate gyrus). The damaged regions of the contralateral hemisphere in patients with left ICA occlusion primarily encompassed the posterior default network (precuneus, inferior parietal lobe, angular gyrus, and amygdala), the salience network (Rolandic operculum, middle cingulate cortex, and amygdala), and the frontal parietal lobe network (angular gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, and inferior parietal lobe). Most of these brain regions are localized within the dominant hemispheric areas. CONCLUSIONS: Cluster analysis and dynamic graph theory analysis of contralateral brain regions in patients with chronic ICA occlusion on different sides revealed significant variations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of NeuroradiologySame topicFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesFrench-language works237,207