MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117765407 · doi:10.4236/jss.2025.1312042

Community-Led Transformation of the Housing and Education Systems by York Factory First Nation, Manitoba, Canada

2025· article· W7117765407 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mojibade Odejinmi, Shirley Thompson, Darryl Wastesicoot

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Journal of Social Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIndigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternshipFactory (object-oriented programming)IndigenousLivelihoodQuality (philosophy)Citizen journalismPublic housing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

First Nation communities in Canada face systemic barriers to quality housing and education. This participatory research with Indigenous people from York Factory First Nation (YFFN) from 2022 to 2025 focused on youth capacity-building and developing funding proposals. The YFFN partnered with the University of Manitoba to compete successfully for a “rural, rapid housing” $8.4 million grant in 2023-2024 to fund infrastructure for the education and housing ecosystem of YFFN. This grant funded a state-of-the-art trades school building, four prototype housing designs, dormitory facilities and a Wikiwin post-secondary education program. The Wikiwin “earn as you learn” program offered 20 YFFN youth paid internships to build YFFN houses and take university courses in their community. To analyze the sustainable livelihood benefits of the Wikiwin program, all 20 Wikiwin students were surveyed when starting in 2023 or 2024, and again in 2025, with an 85% response rate (n = 17). A paired t-test found statistically significant (p p < 0.05) for many human, financial, and social assets and at higher rates than the YFFN control group (n = 9). This case study found many benefits of community-led post-secondary education, offering a promising approach to transform education and housing systems in First Nation communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.417
Threshold uncertainty score0.970

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0310.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Journal of Social SciencesSame topicIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsFrench-language works237,207