Educational and Social Outcomes in Optic Nerve Hypoplasia and Septo-Optic-Pituitary Dysplasia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To describe educational and social outcomes in optic nerve hypoplasia/septo-optic-pituitary dysplasia (ONH/SOD) in Manitoba, Canada. METHODS: A population-based case-control study used administrative health, education, and social data from the Manitoba Population Research Data Repository. A total of 124 ONH/SOD patients diagnosed during 1990-2019 were matched to 620 unrelated population-based controls on area of residence, birth year, and sex. Multivariable logistic regression tested for differences between cases and controls on selected educational and social outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated. RESULTS: Cases had higher odds than controls for requiring specialized educational funding (OR: 13.12, 95% CI: 7.06-24.40). Vulnerability in any five domains of Early Development Instrument, a measure of school readiness, showed higher odds in cases (OR: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.09-6.10). In addition, cases had higher odds of contact with Child and Family Services (OR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.22-2.69), and being taken into care at any time after birth (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.32-3.35). CONCLUSIONS: Cases with ONH/SOD had a need for greater resources and more adverse educational and social outcomes. It is recommended for social and educational service providers to work together with health care providers to ensure appropriate supports are in place for cases with ONH/SOD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".