MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117877818 · doi:10.12775/qs.2025.48.67092

Sport as one of the preventive factors of osteoporosis - a literature review

2025· article· en· W7117877818 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueQuality in Sport · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsWSP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOsteoporosisPsychological interventionPhysical activitySports medicineRisk factorBone healthPopulationBone mineralVitamin D and neurologyResistance (ecology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Osteoporosis is a systemic skeletal disorder characterized by reduced bone mass and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, leading to increased fracture risk. Its prevalence continues to rise with population aging, and osteoporotic fractures-particularly of the hip, vertebrae, and distal radius-represent a major cause of disability and mortality in older adults. Lifestyle factors play a crucial role in the development and progression of the disease, with physical inactivity identified as one of the key modifiable risk factors. Evidence indicates that appropriately designed physical activity, especially resistance and weight-bearing training, can effectively improve bone mineral density, reduce fall risk, and contribute to long-term fracture prevention. This review summarizes current knowledge on osteoporosis with particular emphasis on the role of sport and structured physical activity in its prevention. Purpose of work: The purpose of this article is to review current scientific literature regarding the epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, and clinical consequences of osteoporosis, with a particular emphasis on the role of physical activity and sports as preventive measures. The work aims to summarize evidence on exercise interventions effective in improving bone mineral density and reducing fracture risk in at-risk populations. Materials and methods: An analysis of scientific articles available on PubMed and Google Scholar was conducted using the following keywords: osteoporosis, weight-bearing exercise, fracture prevention, aging, postmenopausal women, fall risk, musculoskeletal health, vitamin D, calcium, bone metabolism, epidemiology, risk factors, preventive medicine Results: The reviewed literature confirms that physical activity is a key factor in maintaining bone health and preventing osteoporosis progression. Resistance and weight-bearing exercises consistently improve or preserve bone mineral density, particularly in the femoral neck and lumbar spine. Multimodal programs combining strength, balance, and mobility training show superior effects compared with low-intensity activities such as swimming or recreational walking. Regular exercise also enhances muscle strength, balance, and coordination, leading to a reduced risk of falls-one of the primary causes of osteoporotic fractures. High-impact sports are associated with higher BMD, while supervised resistance training is especially effective for older adults.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.390

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it