MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7117892463 · doi:10.58406/jpml.v8i2.2258

PENINGKATAN KOMPETENSI PENELITIAN GURU DAN SISWA KELOMPOK ILMIAH REMAJA MELALUI PELATIHAN KARYA TULIS ILMIAH DI SMAN 1 EMPANG, KABUPATEN SUMBAWA

2025· article· W7117892463 on OpenAlexaff
Ieke Wulan Ayu, I Made Widiarta, Arya Ningsih

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat Lokal · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational Methods and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResearch methodExperimental research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Kemampuan pendidik maupun peserta didik dalam melaksanakan penelitian dan menghasilkan karya tulis ilmiah merupakan kompetensi fundamental dalam pendidikan menengah. Tujuan kegiatan pengabdian masyarakat adalah untuk memberikan pelatihan karya tulis ilmiah pada guru dan siswa SMAN 1 Empang. Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat dilaksanakan di Laboratorium Fisika Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 1 Empang, yang berlokasi di Jalan Raya Bonto - Empang, Desa Bunga Eja, Kecamatan Empang, Kabupaten Sumbawa, NTB pada bulan Desember 2025. Peserta kegiatan adalah guru mata pelajaran dan siswa yang tergabung dalam KIR. Alat dan bahan yang digunakan dalam kegiatan,yaitu: a) Alat terdiri dari laptop,proyektor lcd, papan tulis, mikrofon; b) Bahan terdiri dari materi persentasi. Metode kegiatan yaitu metode ceramah interaktif, metode diskusi, dan praktik. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan adanya peningkatan kemampuan peserta dalam merumuskan permasalahan, menyusun rancangan penelitian sederhana, dan menuliskan hasil penelitian secara sistematis sesuai kaidah ilmiah. Selain meningkatkan kompetensi teknis, kegiatan mendorong tumbuhnya motivasi dan kepercayaan diri guru dan siswa untuk terlibat aktif dalam kegiatan penelitian dan pengembangan budaya ilmiah di lingkungan sekolah. Pelatihan karya tulis ilmiah ini dapat dikembangkan sebagai model penguatan kompetensi penelitian di tingkat SMA, khususnya dalam mendukung pembelajaran berbasis riset dan pengembangan sumber daya manusia yang unggul.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.170

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Pengembangan Masyarakat LokalSame topicEducational Methods and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207