1925-2025 Namsan Chōsen Jingū: Field Survey and Stone Structure Documentation (Centennial Evidence Package v1.0)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
“This is v0.1; v1.0 will follow in 2026 as a versioned update” Abstract (English) This working paper is a Research Artifact Package that seals and structures field evidence related to the former Chōsen Jingū (Namsan, Seoul; established 1925) in the centennial year of 2025. The package provides reproducible documentation—GPS coordinates, comparative photographs (c. 1920s vs. 2025), frame-based evidence from pre-1962 films, an official correction letter regarding mislabeling in the Seoul Station centennial exhibition, and a centennial timestamp captured on 2025-10-15. Rather than presenting a finalized historical monograph, the goal is to fix provenance and integrity (public timestamp + SHA-256 hashes) and to offer a verifiable foundation for peer review, documentary production, exhibitions, and future research versions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.069 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".