Hubungan antara religiusitas dan efikasi diri dengan kecemasan sosial pada mahasiswa yang menghadapi fase quarter life crisis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entering early adulthood, a person will be in the quarter-life crisis phase (a quarter century at the age of 20-25 years). This identity crisis occurs due to an individual's unpreparedness during the transition from adolescence to adulthood. Anxiety itself is a condition of worry that complains about the fear that something frightening will happen. In this study, the author chose a theme related to the relationship between religiousness and self-efficacy towards social anxiety faced by students of UIN Walisongo Semarang, aiming to delve deeper into the connection between the nature of religiosity and self-efficacy or the ability to meet one's own demands against social anxiety being faced during the quarter-life crisis phase. This research employs a qualitative approach with a sample of 100 students from UIN Walisongo Semarang, conducted in May-June 2025, with results indicating a negative relationship between religiosity and social anxiety. with a significance value of 0.028 which is less than 0.05 (0.028 < 0.05) so the correlation between the two variables is declared significant. There is a negative relationship between self-efficacy and social anxiety with a sig. (2-tailed) value of 0.046 which is less than 0.05 (0.046 < 0.05). There is a significant simultaneous relationship between religiosity and self-efficacy with social anxiety with a (sig, F change) value of 0.012. Since the sig. F change value of 0.012 < 0.05, the correlation between these variables is declared significant. It can be concluded that there is a relationship between religiosity and self-efficacy regarding social anxiety among UIN Walisongo Semarang students when facing the quarter-life crisis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".