MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W7118082418 · doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000003833

Psychological Resilience and Mental Wellbeing Mitigate the Risk of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

2025· article· en· W7118082418 on OpenAlexaff
M. Zhang, Judith Wellens, Haosen Ji, Jing Sun, Xinxuan Li, Rahul Kalla, Yuan Chun Ding, Evropi Τheodoratou, Jack Satsangi, Xue Li

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGastrointestinal motility and disorders
Canadian institutionsCentre for Global Health Research
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsIrritable bowel syndromePsychological interventionPsychological resilienceMental healthPsychological stressResilience (materials science)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Comorbidities between mental disorders and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) have been widely reported, yet associations between mental wellbeing and IBS, particularly regarding underlying genetic modification and proteomic signatures, remain underexplored. METHODS: This prospective cohort study analyzed 75,842 IBS-free participants aiming to investigate the prospective association between mental wellbeing and the risk of IBS in UK Biobank. Mental wellbeing was assessed through life satisfaction, positive affect, neuroticism, and depressive/anxiety symptoms. Cox models evaluate the hazard ratio (HR) for mental wellbeing and plasma proteome in relation to incident IBS during follow-up. Proteomic profiling identified mental wellbeing-associated proteins, with pathway enrichment analysis revealing biological mechanisms. Mediation and Mendelian randomization analyses further examine intermediate pathways and causality. RESULTS: With a 12.4-year follow-up period, 1,400 cases of incident IBS were documented. Better mental wellbeing mitigated IBS risk dose-dependently (low risk group: HR, 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.43). Higher life satisfaction (HR, 0.41; 95% CI: 0.30-0.56) and positive affect (HR, 0.50; 95% CI: 0.41-0.62) were inversely associated with IBS risk, whereas neuroticism (HR, 2.35; 95% CI: 1.92-2.88) and depressive/anxiety symptoms (HR, 3.09; 95% CI: 2.17-4.42) increased the risk. Findings remained consistent in across prevalent IBS and IBS subtypes. Mental wellbeing effects were independent of genetic predisposition. Mediation analyses revealed about 27% of protective effect of mental wellbeing were mediated through reduced depression and anxiety. Mendelian randomization supports causal protective effects of positive mental wellbeing on IBS. Proteomic profiling identified mental wellbeing-associated proteins mainly enriched in cytokine-cytokine receptor interactions. Chromogranin A and gastrin emerged as key protein biomarkers, showing significant associations with both mental wellbeing components and IBS risk. DISCUSSION: Our study demonstrates that enhanced mental wellbeing confers substantial protection against IBS development, highlighting psychological interventions as potential primary prevention strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicGastrointestinal motility and disorders→French-language works237,207→