MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7118083965 · doi:10.71317/rjsa.003.03.0625

Agro-Morphological Evaluation of Semi-Arid Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Genotypes for Grain Yield Improvement

2025· article· W7118083965 on OpenAlexaff
Ghulam Sarwar Langah, Shabana Memon, A Ullah, Tanweer Fatah Abro, Muhammad Hassan Soomro, Muhammad Waris

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Journal for Social Affairs · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicGenetics and Plant Breeding
Canadian institutions123 Certification (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandomized block designGrain yieldCropYield (engineering)GenotypeCrop yieldGrowing season

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wheat is widely cultivated cereal crop across diverse agro-climatic regions including Pakistan and serves as a staple food for billions of people. In the current study 17 wheat genotypes were evaluated from the semi-arid wheat yield trial (SAWYT) along with local check variety (NIA-Amber) at the Seed Production & Development Centre (SPDC), Tando-Jam, during the rabi season of 2024–2025 to assess agro-morphological traits associated with grain yield. The experiment, laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. It was revealed from the findings that all genotypes showed highly significant differences (P ≤ 0.01) for all traits studied. However, SAWYT-17 was the earliest genotype (58.66 days to heading) and recorded the highest harvest index (59.08%), while SAWYT-2 exhibited the tallest plant height (116.55 cm) and semi-dwarf types included SAWYT-9 and SAWYT-10. The longest spike was observed in SAWYT-8 (10.25 cm), and the maximum spikelets spike⁻¹ in SAWYT-16 (22.23). Grain yield per plot was highest in SAWYT-4 (2.23 kg), biological yield was maximum in SAWYT-8 (4.40 kg), and 1000-grain weight was maximum in SAWYT-7 (56.85 g), followed by SAWYT-6 (53.30 g). The largest flag leaf area was noted in SAWYT-10 (37.85 cm²). Overall, genotypes SAWYT-4, SAWYT-7, SAWYT-8, and SAWYT-17 were identified as promising genotypes for use in breeding programs to enhance wheat yield under semi-arid conditions in Pakistan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.208
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch Journal for Social AffairsSame topicGenetics and Plant BreedingFrench-language works237,207