MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7118088748 · doi:10.4103/pajo.pajo_100_25

Intratumoral cavities in retinoblastoma: Prevalence and association with prognostic histopathological factors

2025· article· en· W7118088748 on OpenAlexaff
Thiago Carvalho e Silva Figueiredo, Caroline Cardoso Gusson, Rafael Nojiri Moreira, Elvira Barbosa Abreu, Sabrina Bergeron, Miguel Noel Burnier

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Pan-American Journal of Ophthalmology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular Oncology and Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistopathologyMalignancyOptic nerveHistopathological examinationChoroidClinical pathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Purpose: Retinoblastoma (RB) is the most common intraocular malignancy in childhood. Intratumoral cavities represent a rare clinical finding and have been scarcely investigated in large histopathological cohorts. This study aimed to determine the prevalence and morphological characteristics of cavitary RB and to evaluate their association with prognostic histopathological factors. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional histopathological study of 192 enucleated eyes with RB from a single ocular pathology center was conducted. Each case was assessed for the presence of intratumoral cavities, the number of cavities, and the largest cavity diameter. Choroidal invasion and optic nerve invasion (optic nerve head or lamina cribrosa) were documented. Results: Cavities were identified in 28.6% of eyes (55/192). Cavitary tumors showed a mean of 3.0 cavities per case and a mean maximum diameter of 2.18 mm (range, 0.5–6.3 mm). Choroidal invasion occurred in 40.0% of cavitary RBs (22/55) and in 46.0% of noncavitary tumors (63/137; P = 0.45). Optic nerve invasion was observed in 52.7% of cavitary RBs (29/55) and in 56.2% of noncavitary RBs (77/137; P = 0.66). Cavitary tumors exhibited well-differentiated components lining the cavities, including Flexner–Wintersteiner rosettes, Homer–Wright rosettes, and fleurettes. Conclusions: Cavitary RB was identified in nearly one-third of enucleated eyes, a frequency higher than that reported in clinical series, but without association with high-risk histopathological factors. These findings support the interpretation that cavitary RB is a well-differentiated morphological variant and provide a basis for future investigations on tumor differentiation, therapeutic response, and clinical outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Pan-American Journal of OphthalmologySame topicOcular Oncology and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207