Experiences of Health Care Interactions Among Older Adults in Geropsychiatric Treatment Following Self-Harm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Physical illness and functional disability are common in older adult populations and strongly linked to suicidal behavior. The aim was to explore how older adults who engaged in self-harm experienced their interactions with healthcare providers. Two separate semi-structured interviews were conducted with each participant. Transcripts were analyzed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis. The participants were recruited among consecutive Swedish-speaking patients in outpatient treatment following self-harm within the last 3-36 months. Exclusion criteria were personality disorder, ongoing psychosis, aphasia, delirium, clinical dementia, or Montreal Cognitive Assessment score indicating moderate/severe cognitive impairment. Out of 22 eligible, nine accepted participation (4 women and 5 men, age range 71-92 years). Prior to their engagement in self-harm, all had their main care contact in primary care and all but one were on antidepressants. Participants described interactions with health care services that amplified their feelings of alienation, loneliness, worthlessness and self-stigma. Difficulties accessing care increased their sense of powerlessness. Some participants were cognizant of their mental health needs but experienced obstacles that hindered them from managing their illness. These situations increased frustration and hopelessness and contributed to the development of suicidal behavior. On the other hand, feeling listened to in trustful and validating relationships helped restore self-respect and agency, and fostered engagement in their individual suicide preventative strategies. Finding can inform clinical approaches to the care of older adults with symptoms of common mental disorders. Exploring experiences of care interactions before and after suicidal acts across different clinical settings and cultures could be areas for future research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".