MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7118135924 · doi:10.70861/ujed20250202001

Economic Diversification through Solid Minerals Sector in Nigeria: Potentials, Challenges and Prospect

2025· article· W7118135924 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sani Garba Wakili, Yakaka Abubakar, Mohammed Baba Adamu, Ahmed Adamu Jajere

Bibliographic record

VenueUMYUK JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND DEVELOPMENT · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldEngineering
TopicMining and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiversification (marketing strategy)Private sectorQuarter (Canadian coin)Government (linguistics)Economic sectorAgency (philosophy)Gross value addedPublic sector

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examined the potentials, challenges and prospect of solid minerals sector of the Nigerian economy; with emphasis to factors responsible for the low performance of the sector in terms of contribution to GDP, export and employment generation. This sector has prospect to promote economic diversification drive of the Federal Government of Nigeria if well developed and managed. Despite government efforts over the years to reposition and revitalize it through legislation, regulation and investment; its optimum output in terms of wealth creation, government revenue, employment generation have been hampered by a number of factors that did not allow the sector to prosper as planned. The study employed Documentary Research Method (DRM) as a source of data; and document analysis in interpreting and presenting research findings. From 1981 – 2022, solid mineral had a positive but statistically insignificant impact on the Nigerian economic growth including export. Nigeria’s Mining and Quarrying sector contributed 7.72% to the overall GDP in the third quarter of 2024, while it recorded 8.32% in the third quarter of 2023 according to the NBS report, 2024. Some of the challenges of the sector include access to high capital and technology; insecurity; poor private sector investment, energy intensive, local human capital, artisanal mining, illegal mining in many solid minerals’ sites, value addition, developing and building investors’ confidence as well as regulatory framework that can guarantee fair fiscal regime among others. In view of this, there is the need for the Federal Government of Nigeria through Nigerian Geological Survey Agency (NGSA) to provide data about locations of solid minerals in commercial quantities in the country for attracting local and foreign investment. Next is to ensure political stability and security in the country; promote forward and backward linkages in the solid minerals sector; provide basic infrastructure and address illegal mining activities across the mining sites in the country.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUMYUK JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND DEVELOPMENTSame topicMining and Resource ManagementFrench-language works237,207