MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

STTATrack: Enhancing One-Stream Single Object Tracking via Score Temporal Token Attention

2025· article· W7118171922 on OpenAlexaff
Omar Abdelaziz, M. Sami Soliman, Ahmed Elgazwy, Mohamed Shehata

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Language
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan CampusKelowna General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmbeddingSecurity tokenTemporal databaseAdaptabilityObject (grammar)Relation (database)Pattern recognition (psychology)Video tracking

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One-stream transformer-based trackers have shown remarkable success in single object tracking by jointly performing feature extraction and relation modeling. However, the update of temporal context, often propagated via temporal tokens, typically relies on general self-attention mechanisms within the transformer backbone. This paper introduces STTATrack, a novel framework that enhances one-stream tracking by explicitly leveraging the immediate spatial certainty from the current frame’s prediction score map to refine these propagated temporal query tokens. Our core contribution, the Score Temporal Token Attention (STTA) module, generates an embedding from the score map and employs a dual attention mechanism to facilitate bidirectional information flow between this spatial certainty embedding and the existing temporal tokens. This targeted refinement allows temporal tokens to be dynamically adapted based on the most current and spatially precise evidence, leading to improved adaptability and temporal consistency. STTATrack builds upon the ODTrack architecture and demonstrates significant performance improvements on the challenging GOT10k, OTB and UAV123 benchmarks, underscoring the efficacy of explicitly integrating current-frame spatial certainty into the temporal refinement loop.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207