Freeze-Dried Chinese Chives (Allium odorum) Powder as a Novel Functional Ingredient: Impacts on Quality and Shelf-Life of Dairy and Oil-Based Products
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study examined how the addition of stabilised Chinese chives powder affects the quality, biochemical parameters, and shelf life of various types of functional products, showing that the lyophilised form of Allium odorum provides the greatest preservation of biologically active components and technological stability, as the content of chlorophylls a and b in the lyophilisate reached higher value (12.6 0.3 mg/g) with fewer losses (14%) compared to vacuum drying.Microbiological control was performed by sowing on nutrient media, which was also greater: the total number of mesophilic aerobic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms after 60 days did not exceed 1.3 10 2 CFU/g.Thus, based on comprehensive laboratory and sensory tests, freeze-drying was recognised as the most suitable method for stabilising Allium odorum for the creation of functional products.The practical value of this study lies in the substantiation of effective dosages and technological solutions for the introduction of Chinese chives into the food industry, which can be used in the creation of enriched products with proven biological activity, stability, and a prominent level of consumer acceptance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".