MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7118338536 · doi:10.29173/assert91

Immersive Memory

2025· article· W7118338536 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Anna Maria Droumpouki

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Social Studies Education Research for Teachers · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermanDynamismThe HolocaustChristian ministryVirtual realityGenocide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Europe, immersive technologies have seen limited application at historically contested sites. Meanwhile, despite the significant impact of the German Occupation of Greece (1941-1944) on public debates and its inspiration for artistic displays and performances, many World War II memory sites in Greece remain largely invisible. This paper presents the “Block 15” project, an innovative initiative hosted by the Athens University of Economics and Business (AUEB) and co-funded by the Greek-German Fund for the Future and the Hellenic Ministry of Culture (https://block15.aueb.gr/wp/). The project focuses on the historical significance of the Chaidari concentration camp in Athens during the German occupation of Greece (1941-1944). By utilizing virtual reality (VR) technology for the first time in Greece to present first-person testimonies from survivors at a site of 'difficult heritage,' this paper aims to explore how digital testimonies can reshape historical understanding and educational practices regarding the Holocaust. The use of VR in the “Block 15” project provides an innovative approach to historical education by immersing users in the testimonies of survivors. This paper argues that VR can preserve the dynamism of survivor narratives, preventing them from becoming static representations that lose their emotional resonance. By actively involving users in the narrative, VR helps maintain the fluidity of memory while addressing the risks of oversimplification or misrepresentation. Through the exploration of these goals and arguments, this paper aspires to contribute to the evolving discourse on digital testimony and its implications for Holocaust and genocide education. This paper also seeks to investigate how VR technology can enhance the pedagogical value of first-person testimonies, facilitating a deeper emotional and cognitive engagement with historical narratives. By offering insights into the integration of VR technology in educational settings, we aim to ensure that the histories of Chaidari’s survivors are preserved and resonate with future generations. Ultimately, this project seeks to illuminate the broader implications of trauma and memory, fostering critical reflections on how the past continues to influence the present.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.360
GPT teacher head0.579
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Social Studies Education Research for TeachersSame topicMemory, Trauma, and CommemorationFrench-language works237,207