MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7118537161 · doi:10.71465/mrcis149

Reducing Deployment Latency and Improving Runtime Stability in AR/VR Platforms via Unified Services

2025· article· W7118537161 on OpenAlexaff
Adrian K. Lau, Emilia D. Fraser, Joris M. van Leeuwen

Bibliographic record

VenueMultidisciplinary Research in Computing Information Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatency (audio)Software deploymentCloud computingRollbackWindow (computing)Mobile deviceTelemetryResponse time

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AR/VR platforms run many services across devices and networks, which can slow rollouts and reduce runtime quality. We built and tested a service convergence approach that unifies device-facing and content services, and places them across edge and cloud with simple rules tied to latency targets. The study covered three regions, six device classes, and a 12-week window using a blocked cross-over schedule. We measured end-to-end timing with OpenTelemetry spans and motion-to-photon (MTP) with an optical rig. Median deployment latency fell from 128 s to 69 s (−46. 1%); p95 service-call latency fell from 214 ms to 132 ms; MTP p99 improved from 58 ms to 44 ms. Rollback events during upgrades dropped by 31%. A shared event format reduced duplicate logs by 41%, cut median time-to-detect from 66 s to 46 s, and lowered distinct incident clusters by 33%. These results show that treating scene, input, and telemetry as services—and placing them near users when needed—improves speed and stability and simplifies operations. The approach suits multi-device deployments; limits include three regions, six device types, and a 12-week study period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.756
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMultidisciplinary Research in Computing Information SystemsSame topicHealthcare Technology and Patient MonitoringFrench-language works237,207