The Role of Internal Locus of Control in Quarter-Life Crisis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Master of Psychology students who are generally in early adulthood will tend to utilize their knowledge and expertise to achieve their goals because they are in the achievement stage. However, when are unable to respond to the pressure, it will cause feelings of anxiety, stress, and another psychological problem. The various crises experienced by Master of Psychology students during the early adult stage are called quarter-life crisis. This study aims to determine the relationship between internal locus of control and quarter-life crisis. This research is a quantitative type with correlational techniques. The participants were selected using the purposive sampling method with the characteristics of Master of Psychology students at Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya aged 22-30 years. Data analysis techniques using Spearman’s Rho show a score of rxy = -0.270 with sig. 0.015 (p<0.05). It means that the higher the internal locus of control, the lower of quarter life crisis. This research found that locus of control internal effectively contributed 7.29% to quarter life crisis. Furthermore, Master of Psychology students at Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya experienced a moderate quarter life crisis, with 50 students or 61.7% of the 81 total respondents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".