MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W7118680350 · doi:10.30581/jcmm.2025.20.2.95

Effect of Postoperative Rehabilitation Using Muscle Energy Technique in a Patient with Complete Patellar Tendon Rupture Accompanied by Patellar Avulsion Fracture: A Case Report

2025· article· W7118680350 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Korean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine Spine & Nerves, Jeong-Su Park, Ha-im Park, Seung-Hyun Oh, Jee-Woo Oh, Seung-ryong Yeom, Young-Dal Kwon

Bibliographic record

VenueKorean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine Spine and Nerves · 2025
Typearticle
Language
FieldMedicine
TopicTendon Structure and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRehabilitationAvulsionPatellar tendonTendonPatella

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives This study reports the clinical outcomes of integrative Korean medicine treatment in a patient who underwent surgical repair for patellar tendon rupture with patellar avulsion fracture. Methods A 27-year-old male received integrative Korean medicine treatment six weeks after surgery, including acupuncture, pharmacopuncture, Chuna manual ther-apy (rectus femoris muscle energy technique), and exercise instruction. Clinical out-comes were assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Range of Motion (ROM), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), and Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Results Pain decreased from 5 to 2 on the NRS, WOMAC improved from 59 to 11, and knee flexion increased from 60°/80° to 130°/150°. The SF-36 score improved from 50.1 to 80.0. Despite postoperative stiffness from six weeks of brace immobili-zation, the patient achieved rapid functional recovery and daily activity resumption. Conclusions Integrative Korean medicine may aid pain reduction, knee mobility re-storation, and quality-of-life improvement after patellar tendon repair.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKorean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine Spine and NervesSame topicTendon Structure and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207